Are you Managing your Company’s Reputation or Doing SEO?

SEO

 

While reputation management and search engine optimization (SEO) have long been categorized as different activities, the management of both practices is almost identical with two exceptions, scope and instances where a reaction is required to counter negative content that has been published prior to the initiation of a proactive reputation management program. Regarding the difference between the two practices in terms of scope, traditional SEO campaigns are narrower with the objective of optimizing single pages to rank at the top of search engine results pages (SERPs) for strategically selected keyphrases. A proactive reputation management campaign, on the other hand, with be initiated for the purpose of populating the front pages of SERPs with multiple page listings.

The second difference, where reputation management strategies are executed in reaction to negative publications, focuses the energy and resources of the campaign on developing content to counter the specific keyphrases contained in the targeted content. For example, if the published negative content specifically mentions “ABC Product”, the campaign would focus on optimizing content based on the keyphrase “ABC Product” as well as the company’s name and any other search terms that might pull up the negative content. Under these circumstances, the campaign would be focused on defending specific search terms as defined by outside events, rather than focusing on keyphrases that provide the greatest opportunities, traffic, conversions, etc.

For businesses that have yet to initiate reputation management and SEO campaigns or for those running them as separate entities, the similarities in execution provide an opportunity to consolidate resources and efforts to realize a sum that is greater than the two parts. In effect, running an SEO campaign like a reputation management initiative or vice-versa can serve the marketing objectives of SEO while also building a protective wall around the business’ reputation. In addition to these benefits, the combined campaigns can play an integral role in building the brand of the company through the strategic and comprehensive development of content that provides valuable and relevant information to the target market.

The provision of company intelligence then serves to build trust and credibility (building the brand), supplement the marketing purposes of SEO and, as an increasing number of listings ascend the SERPs, increase visibility. In addition to hindering the ascension of negative content, the self-reinforcing cycle also delivers another key benefit; more listings at the top of the SERPs for the sponsoring company means less visible listings for competitors. This outcome adds another aspect to the positive cycle as ownership of the front pages of the SERPs fortifies both marketing and brand building efforts as potential and existing customers see an expanding presence in the results for their search queries.

Featured News

  • User Experience and SEO

    SEO

     

    Prior to Google’s implementation of the Hummingbird algorithm in the second half of 2013, search engine optimization and delivering a positive user experience with published content were distinctly different practices. Despite Google’s mission to surface high value content, its algorithms were easily manipulated with SEO tricks that didn’t necessarily deliver the information that the search engine users were looking for. At the same time, content that delivered relevant information often earned lower rankings than poorly written articles that prioritized packing in keywords over adding value.

     

    Hand it to Google, the search engine has stayed true to its commitment to deliver improved user experiences and is now far less vulnerable to manipulative practices. Its ranking algorithm now factors a variety of signals that result from positive user experiences, including:        

            

            Links from authority sites – Content that contains valuable source material, topic-relevant information or delivers a positive user experience in general can earn links from authority sites to provide additional information or to be cited as a reference. These links carry an increasing amount of weight in the ranking algorithms due to the quasi-vetting process from originating authority sites. This is a completely different ranking methodology than the one which rewarded web pages that had thousands of spammy backlinks purchased for a few pennies each.       

            Social actions – When content is posted to social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook, user can elect to share that material with their friends and/or followers. Sharing or liking posted content is referred to as a social action, which is an indication that the content delivers a positive user experience, whether it’s entertaining, informative or a combination of the two. Steady and/or increasing social actions with specific web pages can then boost rankings due to the implied legitimacy of independent referrals.    

             Active and positive comment threads – Quality content draws engagement in the form of active commentary threads. Content that is generating shares and likes will also elicit commentary, with the actions reinforcing each other when being weighed by search algorithms. While these reinforcing actions are great for SEO campaigns, they are equally capable of driving higher rankings for negative content, such as news stories.    

     

    In today’s SEO campaigns, manipulating the algorithms has become increasingly difficult. This is due in part to the growing sophistication in algorithm methodology that can detect spammy links and content. It is also due to the evolution in the way people communicate and share information on the web. The paradigm change now forces SEO and content distribution campaigns to focus on the same primary goal; delivering a positive user experience. 

  • One SEO Change to Implement Now

    social-media-marketing

    As the sophistication of search algorithms continues to increase, search engines are improving their understanding of what their users are looking for with their inquiries. Prior to replacing its search methodology with the Hummingbird algorithm in 2013, search results typically showed results that had a high percentage of the same keywords included in users’ inquiries. While the pages that were returned based on keyword matches generally reflected some relevance to the search, there were also results that had nothing to do with the nature of the inquiry.

     

    Two of the primary reasons for these unrelated results were black hat techniques that were used to trick the early algorithms into granting high ratings, as well as words that were spelled the same but had different meanings, known as homonyms. An example of a homonym is the word “lead”, which can either be a noun as in the metal or a verb as in “to guide”. An inquiry such as “lead dog” could list sculptures of dogs made of the metal as well as dog teams in the Iditarod race. Refining the search to “what is a lead dog Iditarod” could still return mixed results. With the implementation of the Hummingbird algorithm, searches provided results based on the context of the inquiry, rather than trying to find pages with identical keywords.

     

    The change to contextual search, in addition to providing a higher percentage of relevant results for all users, was also influenced by the more conversational nature of inquiries from mobile device users. When voice commands are used, it’s more natural to ask a question than limiting inquiries to a few key words. As the search phrases became longer, keyword-based algorithms struggled to return listings that answered the questions that were being posed, which required follow-on searches and lead to a less than optimal user experience.

     

    For businesses that have not changed the foundation of their SEO initiatives to the new search methodology, previously high rankings are likely to start falling, if they haven’t already. The key to success in context-based search is to modify content so that it answers the questions posed verbally by mobile users. As a simple example, a searcher may pose the question “Where is a pizza place in Anytown?” Content that answers that question, which would earn a higher search listing, would include something like “Jack’s Pizza is located at 123 Main Street in Anytown.”

     

    As Google and the rest of the search engines try to deliver the best user experience possible, the focus is on eliminating listings that don’t deliver the answers sought by searchers. To that end, the listings that are presented will increasingly address the full context of inquiries with the delivery of specific answers. In this environment the SEO campaigns that are modified to answer questions, rather than match keywords to searches, will deliver website and storefront visits which will drive revenues.  

Our Solutions